2022Convocatoria ordinaria · Serie 5 · Ejercicio 1Part 1: Listening comprehension, the history of handwashing
3 puntosCoincide con la pautaTemas: Comprensión oralEnunciado oficial
THE SURPRISING HISTORY OF HANDWASHING
In this radio programme you are going to hear some new words. Read and listen to them. Make sure you know what they mean.
go delirious: entrar en un estat de deliri / entrar en un estado de delirio
ward: sala d’hospital / sala de hospital
midwife: llevadora / comadrona
puzzling: misteriós / misterioso
aisle: passadís / pasillo
Ready?
Now read the questions on the following page. Read them carefully before listening to the radio programme.
[Now listen to the interview.]
QUESTIONS
Choose the best answer according to the recording. Only ONE answer is correct.
[3 points: 0.375 points for each correct answer. Wrong answers will be penalized by deducting 0.125 points. There is no penalty for unanswered questions.]
1.1 Where did Ignaz Semmelweis work?
[0.375 points]
1.2 Which of the following statements about Vienna General Hospital is NOT true?
[0.375 points]
1.3 Child bed fever was a disease affecting
[0.375 points]
1.4 Why did the hospital divide the maternity ward into two clinics?
[0.375 points]
1.5 As he tried to discover why more women were dying in one of the clinics, what did Ignaz do first?
[0.375 points]
1.6 Which of the following statements is TRUE about Ignaz’s work?
[0.375 points]
1.7 Ignaz discovered that child bed fever
[0.375 points]
1.8 Once the doctors started to wash their hands after performing autopsies,
[0.375 points]
Audio oficial
Audio oficial de la comprensión oral: Generalitat de Catalunya, Eureka, biblioteca digital (registro 334). Licencia CC BY-NC-SA 4.0. Registro en Eureka
Elige tu opción y abre la respuesta para compararla.
1.10,375 puntos
- a) In the Emperor’s palace in Vienna.
- b) In a small town in Hungary.
- c) In a large hospital in Vienna.
- d) The recording does not say where he worked.
- a) Descartada
No se dice en el programa.
- b) Descartada
Era un médico húngaro, pero la profesora sitúa su trabajo en Viena: «The story begins in 1844 in Vienna, Austria».
- c) Correcta
La profesora lo dice al empezar la historia: «Ignaz worked in Vienna General hospital, which was the largest maternity hospital in the world». Es decir, trabajaba en un gran hospital de Viena.
- d) Descartada
Sí lo dice: trabajaba en el hospital general de Viena.
1.20,375 puntos
- a) The hospital had too many patients.
- b) It was a very large hospital.
- c) It only served veterans of war.
- d) The sanitary conditions were poor by today’s standards.
- a) Descartada
Es verdadera: «The conditions at Vienna General hospital were so crowded that they had to divide the maternity ward into two clinics».
- b) Descartada
Es verdadera: era «the largest maternity hospital in the world».
- c) Correcta
Es la frase falsa: era «the largest maternity hospital in the world», con mujeres que acababan de dar a luz; en el programa no se habla de veteranos de guerra.
- d) Descartada
Es verdadera: según la profesora, «Conditions for healing were very poor».
1.30,375 puntos
- a) babies who had just been born.
- b) women who had just given birth.
- c) older children who had become delirious.
- d) anyone living in a house with small children.
- a) Descartada
No afectaba a los recién nacidos: la profesora habla de mujeres tras el parto.
- b) Correcta
La profesora dice que las mujeres notaban los síntomas «just a few days after giving birth» y que la enfermedad fue «responsible for the death of many, many women».
- c) Descartada
El delirio que menciona es el de la madre: «She would start screaming because of the pain and go delirious», y no habla de niños mayores.
- d) Descartada
No se dice en el programa; los síntomas aparecían tras dar a luz.
1.40,375 puntos
- a) Because doctors were better trained than midwives.
- b) Because rich people did not want to be in a ward with poor people.
- c) Because they needed more doctors.
- d) Because the hospital had too many maternity patients.
- a) Descartada
La profesora dice que «doctors had more training than midwives», pero lo cuenta como algo desconcertante, no como el motivo de dividir la sala.
- b) Descartada
No se dice en el programa.
- c) Descartada
No se dice en el programa.
- d) Correcta
La profesora lo explica así: «The conditions at Vienna General hospital were so crowded that they had to divide the maternity ward into two clinics». La sala se dividió porque había demasiadas pacientes.
1.50,375 puntos
- a) He considered solutions that others had proposed.
- b) He analyzed blood samples in a laboratory.
- c) He compared data from several hospitals.
- d) He treated patients in both clinics.
- a) Correcta
La profesora responde: «first he analyzed some of the explanations that people had already suggested». Lo primero que hizo Ignaz fue, pues, considerar las soluciones que otros ya habían propuesto.
- b) Descartada
No se dice en el programa.
- c) Descartada
No se dice en el programa; lo que comparó fueron las dos clínicas del mismo hospital.
- d) Descartada
No se dice en el programa que tratara a pacientes de las dos clínicas.
1.60,375 puntos
- a) He discovered the importance of handwashing soon after the clinics were divided.
- b) His discovery of the importance of handwashing was based on luck.
- c) He discovered the importance of handwashing because he had done controlled experiments.
- d) His friend Robert actually discovered the importance of handwashing, but he died too soon to take credit so Ignaz took the credit instead.
- a) Descartada
Dice lo contrario: «it took him several years».
- b) Descartada
El programa habla de experimentos y de una hipótesis que Ignaz puso a prueba, no de suerte.
- c) Correcta
La profesora dice: «He did what any good scientist would do: he set up controlled experiments», y después: «To test his hypothesis, Ignaz had the doctors wash their hands with a disinfectant».
- d) Descartada
Robert fue una pista, no el descubridor: al morir, Ignaz «noticed that his dying friend shared a lot of characteristics» con las mujeres enfermas.
1.70,375 puntos
- a) was spread by the doctors’ lack of personal hygiene when working.
- b) was caused by germs.
- c) was caused by contaminated water in one of the clinics.
- d) only affected women after giving birth.
- a) Correcta
El entrevistador resume: «the doctors were spreading the disease from cadavers to mothers who had just given birth», y la profesora lo confirma con «Exactly». Los médicos transmitían la enfermedad por no lavarse las manos tras las autopsias.
- b) Descartada
Dice lo contrario: en la época «They didn’t know about germs»; que los gérmenes causan enfermedades se descubrió más tarde.
- c) Descartada
No se dice en el programa.
- d) Descartada
Ignaz vio que su amigo Robert tenía síntomas parecidos y dedujo que la enfermedad «obviously wasn’t only related to giving birth».
1.80,375 puntos
- a) the number of women dying in the clinic served by doctors increased.
- b) the number of women dying in the clinic served by doctors decreased.
- c) the number of women dying in both clinics remained unchanged.
- d) the two clinics were combined again into a single, large maternity ward.
- a) Descartada
Dice lo contrario: la mortalidad bajó.
- b) Correcta
La profesora lo dice con estas palabras: «Once the doctors started doing this, the mortality rate of women in their clinic decreased to the same level as that in the midwives’ clinic».
- c) Descartada
Dice lo contrario: la mortalidad de la clínica de los médicos bajó hasta igualarse a la de la clínica de las comadronas.
- d) Descartada
No se dice en el programa que volvieran a unirse las dos clínicas.
Transcripción oficial del audio
Interviewer: We take it for granted now that washing our hands is a tool to fight disease. But somebody had to discover that, and most of the credit goes to a Hungarian doctor named Ignaz Semmelweis. How did he come to realize that handwashing was so important for our health? To answer that, we’ve invited Dr. Diana Tulane, a professor of the history of medicine at Purdue University in Indiana who has studied Ignaz Semmelweis, to our program. Welcome and good morning, Prof. Tulane.
Prof. Tulane: Good morning, and thank you for inviting me.
Interviewer: My pleasure. How did you become interested in Ignaz? Is he famous?
Prof. Tulane: Actually, I was interested in medicine as practiced in the 19th century, and Ignaz Semmelweis became an important name in medicine from that period.
Interviewer: I’m assuming he had something to do with handwashing.
Prof. Tulane: Yes, that’s right. The history of handwashing is actually complicated, and it’s pretty amazing that someone discovered the importance of handwashing at a time when most people thought disease was caused by something like bad air.
Interviewer: How can the history of handwashing be complicated? It seems like a pretty basic thing to do.
Prof. Tulane: Now it seems basic, but that wasn’t always so. The story begins in 1844 in Vienna, Austria, where Ignaz worked in Vienna General hospital, which was the largest maternity hospital in the world. As you can imagine, hospitals at that time were very different from what we know today. They didn’t know about germs, and hospitals were so crowded that it wasn’t really that rare for there to be more than one patient in a single bed. Conditions for healing were very poor. Not surprisingly, the mortality rate in hospitals of the time was extremely high.
Interviewer: I can imagine.
Prof. Tulane: One disease that was particularly deadly at this time was child bed fever, which was responsible for the death of many, many women. Women would notice symptoms just a few days after giving birth. Child bed fever was a particularly dramatic disease because it occurred at a time when people were supposed to be very happy, as their child had just been born, but things could go very bad for the mother in a very short period of time. She would start screaming because of the pain and go delirious, and die a horrible death.
Interviewer: How terrible. What caused this disease?
Prof. Tulane: We know now that this disease is caused by a bacterial infection, but that wasn’t known at the time. Remember, they didn’t know about germs.
Interviewer: So what happened at the hospital in Vienna?
Prof. Tulane: The conditions at Vienna General hospital were so crowded that they had to divide the maternity ward into two clinics, one that was served by doctors, and the other that was served by midwives. Soon it became apparent that many more women were getting child bed fever and dying in the doctors’ clinic than in the midwives’ clinic. This was very puzzling to everyone, because doctors had more training than midwives, so everyone expected that doctors would be able to provide better care. No one understood why more women in the doctors’ clinic were dying.
Interviewer: I bet it was Ignaz who solved the puzzle. And how did he do it?
Prof. Tulane: Well, first he analyzed some of the explanations that people had already suggested. Many people thought that child bed fever was caused by overcrowded conditions, but he knew that that could not be the only factor because both the clinic served by doctors and the one served by midwives were equally crowded, so there was no difference there that would explain the difference in mortality. But he did observe some other differences between the two clinics.
Interviewer: Really? How did he do this?
Prof. Tulane: He did what any good scientist would do: he set up controlled experiments. He had the women in one clinic give birth while lying on their sides, while those in the other clinic gave birth while lying on their backs. He then switched the positions for each group, but this had no effect. More of the doctors’ patients were still dying. Then, he noticed that in the doctors’ clinic, a priest was walking down the aisles ringing a bell. He thought that maybe psychological terror played a role because the women in the doctors’ clinic knew that they were dying once they saw the priest and heard the bell, but that he couldn’t proof that, either.
Interviewer: It sounds like this process took a long time.
Prof. Tulane: Oh yes, it took him several years. Then, in 1847, his best friend Robert, a doctor, was accidentally cut while doing an autopsy and died soon afterwards. Ignaz noticed that his dying friend shared a lot of characteristics with the women dying from child bed fever, so he hypothesized that they all had the same disease, and it obviously wasn’t only related to giving birth. He then observed that the doctors would do autopsies and afterward go directly to the maternity ward to deliver babies. He realized that the disease might be caused by the contact with dead bodies.
Interviewer: So, in effect, the doctors were spreading the disease from cadavers to mothers who had just given birth.
Prof. Tulane: Exactly. To test his hypothesis, Ignaz had the doctors wash their hands with a disinfectant after they performed an autopsy and before they entered the maternity ward. Once the doctors started doing this, the mortality rate of women in their clinic decreased to the same level as that in the midwives’ clinic.
Interviewer: So, did Ignaz become a hero? It sounds like he saved a lot of women’s lives.
Prof. Tulane: Well, yes and no. At first, the medical community was skeptical. Most of the doctors agreed to his idea of handwashing, but Ignaz was not an easy person to work with. For example, he insisted that all cases of child bed fever were caused by contamination from autopsies, even when that really wasn’t possible. In the end, he was taken to a psychiatric hospital and died alone.
Interviewer: How sad! But his realization that handwashing could prevent the spread of disease turned out to be very important.
Prof. Tulane: Yes. At about the same time as his death, scientists discovered that germs cause disease, and that would not have happened without the work of people like Ignaz Semmelweis.
Interviewer: That’s all we have time for today. Thank you, Dr. Tulane, for this very interesting history of handwashing.
Prof. Tulane. Thank you.
Text adapted from the program “The Surprise History of Handwashing” on National Public Radio, January 26, 2021.
Enunciado: Generalitat de Catalunya, Consell Interuniversitari de Catalunya, Oficina d’Accés a la Universitat. PAU de Inglés 2022, convocatoria ordinaria. La imagen es el examen oficial tal cual y el texto lo reproduce; las explicaciones y las respuestas modelo son de EducaIA. Consultado el 7 de noviembre de 2026; el documento no declara fecha de última actualización.
Examen (PDF)Pauta de corrección (PDF)Reutilizado según el aviso legal de la Generalitat